Assange Lawyer: CIA Spooks UNCONSTITUTIONALLY Surveilled my Client

Lead attorney for Julian Assange discusses Assange’s expected final appeal in February 2024. Originally aired December 22, 2023; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep10QCWAKSM

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV

Facebook: facebook.com/HillTVLive/

Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: Rafael Nieves

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO RAFAEL.NIEVES72ATGMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

17 thoughts on “Assange Lawyer: CIA Spooks UNCONSTITUTIONALLY Surveilled my Client

  1. Moral of the story: To use your free speech without getting sued:
    1. Don't use names when speaking your opinion.
    2. Use analogies and hypotheticals and only hint them concerning current events.
    Then they cannot prove you were speaking about them and they have no case.

    The sad reality is that some people deserve to receive defamation because of their bad actions, but they win defamation lawsuits somehow.
    Example: Trump and Biden certainly use their free speech to defame each other, but who should win a defamation case?

  2. It was a trial without discovery or defence. He could not face his accuser. The judge formed a jury with only the amount of money to be decided, not actual guilt or innocence. Clearly his rights were violated. It will be tossed on appeal. The process is the punishment.

  3. The judgment was an absurd amount of money. What of the acts committed in this case, against the voters of Georgia? Why was ballot counting being conducted without the required observers? What was the chain of custody/security of the suitcases of ballots? Where did they come from? Why were they shuffled back through the counting machines numerous times? So many things about this case stinks to high Heaven. God help us!

  4. I watched a lot of sworn testimony about ballots being double counted and ballots being counted after watchers were told to go home. How many of those are in jail? I have no doubt in my mind the election was stolen. Watch 2,000 mules and see many ballots being deposited by one person. . 9:14

  5. Two term Republican mayor of the greatest city in the world, that personally helped to tranform New York City from a dying crime ridden metropolis to a economic and cultural renaissance, known for law and order, who was once known as 'America's Mayor' that handled the 911 attacks, a successful ex-Federal Prosecutor for New York winds up being villified and hung out to dry while failed Chicago mayor Laurie Lightfoot who ran her city into the ground gets a cushy high paying educator job at Harvard…..C'MON MAN! Now, think about that.

  6. What's a Constertution? You mean that old wooden sailboat in that there Boston? I ain't seen no Constertooshun in these parts for quite a spell and I don't much like gettin no dang Bill for Rights either cause, I'm not gonna pay it!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.