Cop Gets Kicked Off Private Property After Tense Dispute

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM_qyR8kkGU

Columbus Police Body Camera’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCS74cWPjEY1EOuVPM4eJhCw

Sources:

Civil Cases vs. Criminal Cases- https://bit.ly/3HlV0ib

Ohio Rev. Code § 2909.06- https://bit.ly/3JsvU3b

Ohio Rev. Code § 2901.22- https://bit.ly/2RYxQde

Carroll v. United States- https://bit.ly/3o387gt

Illinois v. Gates- https://bit.ly/3mHtLqJ

Adams v. Williams- https://bit.ly/3itijxi

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire- https://bit.ly/3pqWcs5

City of Houston v. Hill- https://bit.ly/36hULEM

Lewis v. City of New Orleans- https://bit.ly/3olXJys

Ohio Rev. Code § 2917.11- https://bit.ly/3Hm8NW9

City of Kent v. Dawson- https://bit.ly/3sKfa1y

City of Cincinnati v. Karlan- https://bit.ly/3Hscv0B

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

41 thoughts on “Cop Gets Kicked Off Private Property After Tense Dispute

  1. Thanks for joining us! I can't thank you enough for watching this episode. Be sure to stick around to the end. This encounter gets more interesting as it goes on. Cheers!

  2. To those more informed about law: if I was a cop and, in this situation, wrote up an investigation into vandalism what might happen? Did I do good? Bad? Other?

  3. Yhete should of never been a dispute ever no warrant no entry no trespassing period an arrest warrant is not a warrant to enter private property or home espeacially to search.once told no they should leave period.If they really want to catch the person sit down the street period and wait or apply for a warrant to enter the property and home.

  4. This is a great cop.
    Not enough of these guys out there.
    Now, I know that the Renter / Complaintent is a horrible piece of shit.
    Many officers would have escalated this. This officer though did his job perfectly.

    He attempted the entire time to de escalate, he never let his ego take over. He never abused his power. This is a great cop. This is the behavior we should expect from our police.

  5. A "C-" is a bit generous here. The tenants called the police for a civil matter after the contractor had offered a very reasonable solution to the issue. Both were rude to the officer while he was being very polite and explaining the issue beyond what he was required to do. The husband was insulting and aggressive towards the officer for no reason and even assaulted the contractor right in front of him. Had this been one of the jerk cops this channel usually covers, he would have taken the provocation and arrested the husband for assault. At best, this was a "D-" on the tenant's part and was only prevented from being an "F" by the wife physically restraining her husband from assaulting the officer.

  6. for the police officer – if he really didn't know – to accept payment for a service that cannot or should not be provided is fraud, a criminal offense – or that Piggy is just too lazy to file a criminal complaint because one white person and two black people

  7. He wants help but he won’t shut up long enough and listen to what the officer is telling him. I swear I got so irritated listening to this officer try to explain what they’d need to do in order to have a case against the company, keep getting interrupted by this dude repeating himself.

  8. I don't care so much about the "legalese" in this situation. This man had been seriously butt-hurt and felt helpless. Men have a problem with helpless. He was vomiting his frustration out and should have been understood. The cop's feelings over being fussed at are nothing compared to the circumstances this man is facing for his family. EMPATHY.

  9. Not everyone is a google lawyer, they called for help she didn’t know which is why she called. Idk why he gave her an attitude about that

  10. Why would dispatch even allow the officer to go to the house when it was clearly a civil matter?

    Anyways, I wouldn't give the officer an A since he knew it was a civil matter but did nothing to even remotely help the owners.

    All that he had to do was walk in the house and inspect the extent of the water damage using his body camera, which would have been a very good record/evidence for insurance since they tend to take the word of officers more than that of the claimants. After that, he could have left his card and told them that after they submit their insurance claim to tell the insurance company to call the officer and he will be a witness to the damage.

    I know from experience that when you are the victim of fraud/scam that insurance companies, banks, or other agencies will not be very cooperative without a police detective advocating on your behalf. In many cases, you need an official police report to process claims anyways, and in this case a police officer only inspecting the exterior of the house would be meaningless.

    I don't even know why the officer would show up to the property if he knew it was a civil case and wasn't planning on helping them get the necessary resources to get through this civil matter. He clearly is a cop but does not want to serve as a civil servant to his community.

  11. What do cops do that:
    1) protects regular people
    2) serves the regular people
    3) does anything beneficial for regular people?

    If you change regular people for elite people, it makes sense

  12. The fact that the officer didn't bring it the issue that the tenant seemed drunk or something is a credit to him really doing his best to work with them.
    *The male tenant had slurred speech, couldn't focus even on his own words, and poor balance. Also, he started to snitch on the contractor until he realized it may incriminate himself. 😂

  13. Thats the way cops should engage.people. 5 atars to that officer. He did not take what people said.under duress personally. He just let them vent.

  14. I appreciate all your videos. You gotta give credit where it’s due to show there’s plenty of good people in law enforcement. I don’t think this guy would be hurt if we can end qualified immunity.

Comments are closed.