Facial Recognition Technology Ban for Police Is Important, but Not Enough

San Francisco, the ‘Silicon Valley’ city where facial recognition technology has been developed, is one of the first cities to recognize the risk to city residents of false recognition and over-reliance on technology

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

15 thoughts on “Facial Recognition Technology Ban for Police Is Important, but Not Enough

  1. The real hammer is the type of dystopia featured in some movie called minority report. It’s more than just profiling people, it’s about profiling observable behaviour in order to predict likely next steps an observed person may take. Soon you might get arrested because you are seen to be planning to commit a crime, according to some stupid AI algorithm. The police then acts on those hints to prevent a likely crime from happening. The algorithms then can use the successes and errors to refine their predictive capability, and the better the algorithm’s prediction become, the more the officers will trust them. So you’ll find situations where a group of youngsters get together and the police shows up – just in case. Imagine that.

  2. 😆😁😂😅 The "land of the free" 😅😂😁😆 you use it to spy, China uses it to protect their citizens from crime, improve their massive transport infrastructure to better manage it and divert traffic to better routes, reduce conges, better plan new developments, etc etc etc. BTW, yours is 50% acurate, china's is 99% acurate.

  3. We dont need to automate the police, do the legwork and use your brain.

    I dont want to wear a mask in public and have pebbles in my shoes. I can almost guarantee these will be outfitted with gate recognition too.

  4. Well, I guess just go to Amazon Headquarters and start photographing every car, license plate and person who enters and start a public database of who's visiting. Do it to every corporation working with facial recognition.

  5. As a Black female living in Wash., DC I was profiled the moment I walked into a Harris Teeter Grocery Store!
    I had completed my shopping and was exiting the store along with multiple people when an alarm sounded but only I was stopped by an officer!
    I was asked to present a receipt showing proof of my purchases, my receipt was already in my hand before being stopped.
    I asked the officer (who was in full uniform without a badge or name tag) why was I the only one stopped? Why wasn't everyone else exiting along with me being asked to show their receipts?
    The officer reply was I'm only doing my job.
    I went to customer service and requested to see the store manager and asked why is an officer on duty without a badge or name tag?
    Why was I the only one asked to show proof of my purchases when I had left Harris Teeter?
    Yes, the officer had demanded my receipt in a firm loud voice outside on a public street!
    The manager followed me back to the entrance of the building as I proceeded to walk in and out of the store without an alarm sounding and I ask why?
    I asked the manager why was I the only one selected while multiple people were exiting the building at the same time?
    The manager and I went back to the consumer service desk where I ask to file a complaint.
    I also called Harris Teeter's Corporate Office concerning this incident.
    This led me to believe that I was being monitored and profiled while shopping!
    How else could you explain how I was embarrassed, humiliated, and made to feel as if I was a criminal?
    Do food items have scanners on them to trigger an alarm? If I am to believe this, then why didn't the alarm sound again with me, while the manager and officer are both presents at the point where the alarm sounded?
    As a Citizen, why should I be demanded to comply with
    "their suspicions" of me being a shoplifter rather than a law-abiding consumer out for a routine shopping trip!

  6. Sorry but that sounds like a bullshit claim. Just because the programmers happen to be white males it doesn't mean they would do something as stupid as only using images of white males for their testing.

  7. This is just further proof that governance and Large Corporations are in fact at the helm of our daily lives. A de facto Pandora’s Box……

Comments are closed.