Posted in News

‘Our House Is Still on Fire,’ Warns Greta Thunberg at Davos

   11/18/2023  20 Comments on ‘Our House Is Still on Fire,’ Warns Greta Thunberg at Davos

Youth climate activist Greta Thunberg speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)
Website Twitter

20 thoughts on “‘Our House Is Still on Fire,’ Warns Greta Thunberg at Davos”

  4. Reject this INSANITY,
    ENOUGH‼️☠️‼️
    I’m afraid that Putin’s finally nailed the
    last nail into what was once America’s Democracy.
    O K ENOUGH ‼️
    We have major
    Environmental problems that must be solved !!
    We are screwing ourselves to death.
    Yet, we we continue to attempt to expand,
    More than 7.8 billion people🔚
    Even further upon this fragile Planet.
    🇺🇸 ONCE AGAIN 🇺🇸
    1) Monocultures are impossible to maintain over time!
    2) They simply burn themselves and their environments out existence !!
    3) Your home is on Fire
    4) Please, put it out !!
    🛑 I don’t think
    🌲PUTING A FIRE 🔥 OUT 🌲
    IS an unreasonable request❌

  5. Most, if not all the scientists that are paid by governments are biased and in order to keep their jobs and funding they will skew their research results to mirror the numbers or scenarios that their masters (government employers) want. Unwanted results = no funding (no job). If you want to keep your job, you give them what they want. Do some research and you will find that the scientists with no skin in the game will tell you that there is no climate emergency. Also, look who the "climate emergency scenario" benefits the most. You will find that it is benefiting the wealthy. If you are serious about lowering CO2, go after the countries that pollute the most. The 2017 numbers: China, U.S.A. and, India. The people that it will negatively impact are the poor in developing countries. If these people don't have access to cheap electrical power, they will go back to burning wood or animal dung to cook with and to heat their small huts in the cold night air. There would be no electricity to run a small fridge to keep what little food and medicine they have, from spoiling. These people are already very poor. They can't afford the many unreliable expensive solar panels and wind powered generators. If they don't have access to cheap fossil fuel generators or power plants, you will be sending these people back to the stone age. Many women and children will die from smoke damaged lungs from inhaling the dense smoke from cooking in their tiny huts. Many more will die from spoiled food and medicine because they can't keep these expensive valuable items cold. Is this what you want? Are you going to excuse what you're doing by saying things like " it's no big deal? These people were poor and not worth helping because the world is overpopulated anyway. They won't be missed because they weren't important enough to care about. Will that be your excuse? Maybe in the future, but at this point in time our technology isn't good enough to to provide large, inexpensive, 24 hour reliable power from windmills, watermills, solar panels or solar mirrors. Our planet IS NOT having a climate emergency. For 70 years of my life I have seen so many climate predictions be wrong. Not just one, two or three, but every single one of them. After five or six incorrect predictions I quit counting. Please, do some research. If you want the truth, research the scientists that have no skin in the game. These people will tell you the truth because the results of their research will not affect the money they earn or the position they hold. We older people have seen predictions from global warming, global ice age to ozone depletion. Stop scaring the hell out of our children. Please, stop putting such a burden on them. When you see children crying because they think they are going to die in 10 or 12 years, that has got to be child abuse. Are you trying to damage these kids for the rest of their life? Use some common sense. Try and reassure these kids that the world as we know it is not going to end anytime soon. I have lived through so much of this crap that I can pretty much guarantee it. Stop brainwashing the children. Chicken Little was wrong. The sky is not falling. I will be dead in the near future. Cancer and old age are not my friends. Twelve years from now, after I'm gone, I just want you to remember one thing that I said: . "THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY". Note: Stop worrying so much. You will live a longer, happier life.

  6. As long as we produce 300 trillion watts yearly…the earth will burn. No power source can change that besides local power grids dc that are not grounded to the earth. Haha. Off grid stuff…

  7. I am a progressive voter and can't stand this kid being used for phony propaganda. She is being used. The elites want this stuff to tax us for our outbreaths and CO2. The result will be nuclear power, taxes (like the ones that started the Yellow Vest movement in France), and a 5g control grid, while we continue to get poisoned by all the stuff that doesn't affect climate. Have a fair debate about, not climate change, but the relationship between climate change and human beings. No major outlet will. Period. All the one side ever does is say "90% of climate scientists agree." That's not science. They never discuss how that 90% came to be. They never respond to academic experts who disagree. In the meantime, yes, unchecked capitalism will kill us all eventually, but it will be because of this propaganda not in spite of it.
    This kid never says a word about war, slavery, even pollution. There's a reason for that. Keep shoving this stuff down our throats and see what happens.

  9. Get your news from a school dropout who needs ten suitcases full of clothes to visit Spain for two weeks. Anybody vcan get fooled. I was fooled for a few months by Al Gores movie but it took me only a few months to snap out of it. Why does it take YOU so long?

  10. So this young lady knows more then scientists with doctrines? I understand there is corruption and many political entitys lie! I just want to know what makes this young lady qualified to speak for millions of adults?
    Food for thought

  11. She is just indoctrinated by her parents and being used by her parents to further their ideology. She is being put amongst the world's most ruthless leaders who many cut her down and this will have a devastating effect on her emotional growth.

  13. Nuclear waste is the real crisis. Fukushima plant still a disaster. Save our oceans, land and air.

  16. Bravo little lady, you have more comen sense than all the world leaders combine. Keep up and fight for humanity and staying live.

  17. How come TRN newer talks about those behind GRETA? Like Soros and his NGO's. The Technocratic New World Order etc, its not new news, just old established.

  18. Are you telling me you want to have to flush the toilet twelve times or suffer through a drip, drip, drip hardship when taking a shower? If that’s what the future holds, better we all die from a world ablaze. Lol

  20. Very fine, applaudable speech, but I wonder if she came up with it all alone, or if she received help for the preparation. She's only 17 years old. It's possible that she did it alone. Heck, I recall learning of a 4 year old child being offered a free scholarship or free tuition offer to do studies at U. of Florida in mathematics and this was many years ago, but I don't think it was as much as 20. It was for doing a full degree, probably starting with undergraduate and given how much he was a math genius, probably more, afterwards. It'd have been, either, during the LATE 1990s or else during the 2000s, so pre 2010, but also pre 2009 as well. So, a 17 year old child often can understand what Greta is saying, but if she did the whole preparation for what she'd say, then she clearly does plenty of reading on the topic. Might seem unusual, but it's possible. Wouldn't have been for me, for I was very MUCH an outdoors guy, doing various outdoor activities, so having little time for reading, except for when wanting breaks from the recreational activities.

Comments are closed.