Posted in Politics

Israeli Leaders Face WAR CRIME Charges By ICC: Netanyahu REACTS

   06/12/2024  46 Comments on Israeli Leaders Face WAR CRIME Charges By ICC: Netanyahu REACTS

Briahna Joy Gray and Robby Soave discuss the latest updates out of Israel. #israel #hamaswar

About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day’s political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day’s political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country’s most important political newsmakers.

Follow Rising on social media:

Website: Hill.TV

Facebook: facebook.com/HillTVLive/

Instagram: @HillTVLive

Twitter: @HillTVLive

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: Rafael Nieves

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO RAFAEL.NIEVES72ATGMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)
Website

46 thoughts on “Israeli Leaders Face WAR CRIME Charges By ICC: Netanyahu REACTS”

  2. There is no denying the fact that BN has proven you can beat someone at their own game, and by their own rules show they will not abide by the rules of winners versus losers* as outcome, (as agreed among players given a cause of win and lose (as opposed to right and wrong)) proving the threat against the Jewish state as real right down to the declarations here to that fact.

    However what's at stake given the cause as far as the spectators are concerned is the sum given the score with regard to this score where the losses exceed the captures as unit of measure given progress with regard to this cause when it comes to the spectators in connection to these loses by identity as well (Despite the identity and method of approach given their capturers) and BN has helped to also prove by his efforts given the loses that the captures have sum as equivalent by score with regard to this progress otherwise. (Meaning he has proven his objective with regard to his opoonent cause as well as their 'state' given their intentions with Israel's. No doubt.

    Further, this response by the majority factor has also proved that you also cannot expect to beat the opponent at their own game and think it wasn't the opponents goal all along to get the other player to sacrifice that character and identity** for them. And when ones opponent achieves that objective, you no longer have that identity as well as that distance in order to distinguish yourself from your opponent.

    And that is thebgame of identity assumption with regard to plauers with a cause where the goal is entanglement with ones opponent in order tonachieve that objective when it comes to that anniahlation. (Being removed as a player on the board in the game of right versus wrong.)

    [* Proving the G factor when it comes to the Games-Reality condition in determination of the state of another as one's opponent and the method of approach given strategy.]

    [**And that is the primary objective given the game of identity assumption, in prevention of being 'assumed' in the fullest sense of that definition. (As reasoning behind the primary objective and the illusivity factor to the primary 2 rules when it comes to the 8 rules of engagement. (With regard to players with a cause. (In the game of identity assumption. )))]

    SIM analysis:

    The point proven here as well as the influences given the lateral plays pits the bat into the next set of hands for the final inning. And it won't be up to player 2 cause 2 here at bat considering the latest move with regard ro the threat of that warrant. Because if that it issued. That bat goes into the hands next of the player behind its issuance. And their is no doubt about that given (psst…strategy. and to the highest ranking player given the cause with regard to the lead by condition given that 'fact' in connection to 3 events. (Whule the rest go back to being pieces on their own board. Will the 2 real players plase stand up. Because 1 is in a state of denial while the other makes all the declararion on their behalf. ***]

    [*** brass in pocket. The pretenders. (F with the source code here again)]

    SIM II analysis:

    Getting to the real point when it comes to the objective behind the objective (like the R factor finally as the common denominator rather than the G factor:) the lead given the alternate condition going back to event 1. Because once we have played that one out (no different than with cause 2) it's cause 1s turn. Again.

    And then the precursors that led to event 1 given the original 2 playersand those who lost focus on 1 player and the target population when it came to a follow through. (If the goal here is root cause, like a primary objective. And the intent to achieve it, like player 1 (a) cause 2. )

    [(a) player 5 cause 1s relief pitcher. ]

    SIM III analysis:

    Going back prior in cause to event 1 would take away from resolve given that event and by cause by date into something too longer standing when it comes to lateral plays and a cause other than by event. And so the real resolve here will rest on placeholder positions as based on a cause by date where we have outcome based on these positions. (To a cause that has become about ranking given the axis.)

    And given the current score by position we have the sum already in place by rank given those position.

    Itself in testimony of truth given the 'cause.' And should anybody disagree with the standings so far, intention behind why these rankings shouldn't stand will be the base on further action in testimony of the intention behind that cause. (Given event 1: #1 Z #2 P #3 B #4 X…etc. )

  10. Ask the seven hills scorched by the east imperial wind if Israel is the name of a man? Dear prince of the hill country, a plant on a hill must have unbounded roots. How long will you depend on the dragon for fire water? Ask Humpty Dumpty How that went.

  14. lol.. all you guys realize the Brie at this point is an activist… she’s not a journalist. I can’t imagine she would be easy to work with. I hope Robbie is getting paid a lot to deal with her everyday

  15. What about International Criminal Court issuing arrest warrant against Russia's dictator Vladimir Putin for his war crimes and for invasion of Ukraine? US administration praised and supported ICC for issuing arrest warrant for Putin. It's totally hypocrisy and doubled standard for US, UK and others who supports Netanyahu.

  16. Strategically speaking that guy is clueless about International Law and its dynamics, he is abhorrent beyond articulation and I wish that gorgeous girl would have another host with knowledge and wisdom to help out innocent civilians enveloping our lives

  17. To know who really rules over you. Simply find out who you are not allow to criticize, Voltaire. America is trap in a seventy five years old lie and really doesn't know how to brake away from it. Why the continue, wrong mixing of the words anti Semitic with anti Zionist. So ICC now want to be a coward and bias entity, by accusing both parties of the same crime. You can't not please God and Satan at the same time. You can not punish the victims of a wrong seventy five years occupation of anything but of being a abuse and oppress victims. Displace of their nation, force to live in exile in their own concentration camp country and be the victims of years of genocide People will believe what the media, tells them to believe, George Orwell.

  18. 415 pm There might war crimes against Israel but that doesn’t justify the actions of protesters in the United States they have no right to destroy property nor the rights to instruct daily functions of others that have no involvement

  22. I just had to uncomfortably laugh at Robbie's deliberate and conscious obtuseness at what is a simple principle.
    The idea that the ICC may indite Netanyahu and others clearly ruffled his establishment feathers, but he didn't want to come out and just say it. Hence the rather comical obtuseness..

  23. Israel will shut down the PLA who is lobbying the ICC for this persecution. This will be bad for the Court, Israel and the Palestinians. I don’t think some ICC judges will live long comfortable lives – might be in the wrong place at the wrong time over next several years.

  34. Perhaps if the head of the ICC was not Muslim, the head of the ICC would be going after Sinwar, and other terrorist living in Qatar. Hamas have said they want to wipe out Israel killing every jew, then on Oct 7th they broke into the country and starting killing people, then going house to house and killing innocent families and then took over 100 hostages from a baby under 1 years old to an 86 yo grandmother. That is not attempted genocide or a war crime.

  35. Does Robbie have any idea about anything other than American policy??? Does he know America isn’t the only country in the world a certainly not the most powerful anymore, or if so, not for long

  37. "ICC escalating the conflict and starting WWIII" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard!
    Netanyahu IS THE ESCALATION! He desperately bombed the Iranian embassy to trigger a regional war and draw the US to fight on behalf of Israel.
    As long as this war goes on he is safe from legal prosecution in his own country due to affairs of corruption in which he is involved.

  43. Robby Soave isn’t smart enough to discuss International politics and legalities. My God. Why are we being forced to dumb down every time he opens his mouth. Please demote him to some desk where he can get an education!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.